Wednesday, June 12, 2013

What do academics want – (includes the changing role of the academic library)

A new survey has been undertaken which looks at the changing practices of academics in the UK. Ben Showers of Jisc and Mike Mertens of RLUK discuss three key findings of the survey which demonstrate the influence of new technologies on research, the altering perceptions of support services and the changing role of the academic library.

(Interesting dichotomy - see the graphs in this article - researchers are not particulary interested in publishing in open access publications but the do want to be able to find the information they need freely available to download!)


"The survey underlines that for academics, electronic versions of monographs are not well suited to some research activities.  Specifically, a majority of academics indicated that reading cover-to-cover or in depth reading was ‘much easier’ or ‘somewhat easier’ in print format..."

and: "A major set of findings highlights the value academics place on the role of the library within their teaching and research. While only 2% of respondents visited the library to begin their research query, nearly 90% of respondents saw the library’s most important function as a purchaser of content. Furthermore, around 30% of respondents indicated that the library has a role in increasing the productivity of their research."

How Open Access Empowered a 16-Year-Old to Make Cancer Breakthrough

Published on 11 Jun 2013
An interview on Open Access to research journals with Dr. Francis S. Collins, Director of the National Institutes of Health, and Jack Andraka, the 16-year-old inventor of a breakthrough cancer diagnostic and winner of the 2012 Intel International Science and Engineering Fair.


Jack used free online articles “religiously” in creating his pancreatic diagnostic that is 26,667 times cheaper, 168 times faster, and 400 times more sensitive than the current test.  In discussing his discovery, Jack points to paywalls for journal articles as a central barrier preventing others from making similar breakthroughs.

Jack is a perfect example of the increased innovation that arises from unexpected places when anyone with curiosity, determination, and an Internet connection has Open Access to the research literature. 

Open Access scientific publishing - should you be interested?

Friday, June 7, 2013

Academia will eat itself*: the awkward love triangle of scholarly publishing


from the Law Librarian  and the E-Resources Librarian Sunderland University

There are three major stakeholder groups in scholarly publishing: publishers, academics, and libraries. The awkward love triangle arises because each of these groups needs one of the others, but this relationship is not symmetrical between any two parties. This reminded me of the German chemist KekulĂ©, who had a dream about a snake eating its own tail, which inspired him to propose a cyclic (ring) structure for benzene. Because of the asymmetrical love triangle, it’s difficult to reach agreement through negotiation, as none of the three stakeholder groups can bargain fairly with each other.  One party needs something from another, but it’s always the other who holds all the cards.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

The Societal Impact of Research

 Issue 33 (June 2013) of Research Trends deals with a complex topic: the societal impact of research. One of the ways in which science is valuable to society is through its influence on technology.

Includes an excellent article on The Challenges of Measuring Social Impact Using Altmetrics

Friday, May 24, 2013

Designing researcher-centric library services

from 12th May 2013 Research Information (Analysis and Opinion)


"....findings highlighted three primary areas that would benefit from new or redesigned services. Firstly, there is the area of information discovery. In particular, there is a need to support chemists in keeping up with the literature and enabling serendipitous discovery.
The second key role is research dissemination and scholarly communications. While academic chemists publish frequently, the report revealed the need for greater support in disseminating their research outputs.
Data management and preservation was the third area identified. The report acknowledged a gap in training in how to store, manage and curate the data that is collected by chemists and their labs..."

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Predatory Publishers

Interesting contribution in Library Journal newsletter:
 
"There are definitely publishers who come to mind when I hear the expression “predatory publishers.” My first thought is of the high-profile academic publishers who are increasing their journal prices by ten or 20 percent per year, leaving libraries with impossible choices to be made between maintaining their journal subscriptions in key fields or buying that year’s monographic production. None of these are on Jeffrey Beall’s “Possible Predatory Publishers” list at the Scholarly Open Access site, however. Beall’s list consists of newly formed open access (OA) journals that charge authors a fee for each article published but that allegedly do not follow accepted academic practice for quality publication or are even fraudulent in nature...."

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Monday, May 20, 2013

What Students Really do in the Library: An Observational Study

What Students Really do in the Library


Abstract: The authors observed 730 collegiate students in the library and recorded their study (or non-study) activities. Approximately 60% of behaviors were study related. The most commonly observed behavior was reading print material (18.8%). The second most common behavior was the use of social media (11.4%). These results have implications for understanding how students learn and study in the pervasive digital world.

from the discussion:
"........   Libraries, particularly in times of economic instability, must often justify their existence and use of funds. Demonstrating to library or school administration the actual observed use of the physical library for school-related behaviors can provide one or many pieces of data that may prove useful. Although our finding that 73% of those working on a computer were more likely to engage in a non-study behavior suggests that the presence of computers or other mobile devices can be major distractions, evidence presented in the literature indicates that students expect libraries to be social and study spaces. In addition, making library materials and study materials accessible via mobile technologies (e.g., iPads, smartphones) can allow for more frequent access to these resources. Little to no research has been done regarding the use of the mobile Web by students in the library, with the exception of a qualitative study conducted by. They noted that, depending on reading preferences, students may or may not read actual articles or books online, but they might begin their searches or access library services while waiting on line at the store (Seeholzer & Salen, 2011). Investigating how remote use of library resources ties in with the physical use of the building can provide stakeholders with data that can help to inform decisions.
When we can actually observe what students do rather than what they say they do in the library, we can get a fuller picture of study behaviors and how they relate to academic achievement. It is important for educators to understand that the learning environment can influence student engagement and study behaviors and that the environment is further influenced by a variety of factors. Students expect a comfortable and attractive study space not only for scholarly pursuits, but also for socializing. Social and academic activities are integral aspects for facilitating student engagement (Entwistle & Peterson, 2004; Milem & Berger, 1997; Suarez, 2007). A well-designed library should support scholarly activities, but both the current literature and the results of this study indicate that we cannot expect the library to be a building exclusively used for academic behaviors."

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Massive Open Opportunity: Supporting MOOCs in Public and Academic Libraries

A new development to be aware of:

If you’re an academic librarian, you’re probably already awash, at least peripherally, in news about MOOCs—massive open online courses have been touted as the next big thing in higher ed since they burst on the scene about a year ago................................ There are multiple potential roles for libraries in the MOOC development, support, assessment, and preservation process............

 Wikipedia entry


Monday, May 13, 2013

e-books in Academic Libraries: Challenges for Discovery and Access

Abstract

This paper examines the recent literature on the presentation of e-books in college and university libraries, focusing on three mechanisms for discovery and access: e-book vendors' interfaces, library catalogs (OPACs), and resource discovery tools (RDTs). If libraries rely on vendors' interfaces, patrons must search on multiple platforms, many of which have limited and idiosyncratic search mechanisms. The most common strategy for discovery and access—including e-books in the library catalog—brings its own set of challenges, including limited availability of records, lack of standardization, difficulties managing the addition and removal of titles, and the generally low quality of vendor-supplied records. Likewise, libraries that use resource discovery tools face another set of difficulties: incomplete coverage, reliance on metadata from external sources, problems with subject headings and authority control, difficulties with guest-user access, and continuing dependence on vendors' platforms for access to full text.

Keyword Search, Plus a Little Magic

From Lingua Franca 
Google relies on at least four facts, all of them crucial, but especially the fourth one.
  1. Computer memory chips have become so cheap and so tiny that in an office-sized space you can pack enough random-access-memory units to store an utterly gigantic automatically maintained concordance to the whole Web, augmented with copies of huge portions of what is on those sites.
  2. Networks and processors have become so fast that your search command can be delivered to a server far away and checked against the gigantic index in just hundredths of a second.
  3. The number of sites containing all of the words on a list (rather than just some of them) goes down rapidly with the length of the list, and much more rapidly when the words have low probabilities of occurrence.
  4. Humans looking for a certain piece of information can on the whole be trusted to be smart enough to supply a list of words with the crucial property of having low probability in most texts but being guaranteed to occur in texts containing the desired information.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Taking it to the Stacks: An Inventory Project at the University of Mississippi Libraries

Abstract

This article examines multiple inventory methods and findings from the inventory processes at the University of Mississippi Libraries. In an attempt to reduce user frustration from not being able to locate materials, the University of Mississippi Libraries conducted an inventory process beginning with a pilot inventory of a branch library and a sample inventory at the Main Library followed by full inventory of sections of the Main Library's one-million-plus collection. The benefits of inventories, including cost effective, efficient workflows, are discussed

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Altmetrics and Open Access: A Measure of Public Interest


Researchers, research managers and publishers are increasingly required to factor into their policies and practices the conditions by which publicly funded research must be made publicly available. But in the struggle for competitive funding, how can researchers provide tangible evidence that their outputs have not only been made publicly available, but that the public is using them? Or how can they demonstrate that their research outputs have reached and influenced those whose tax dollars have helped fund the research?

Monday, April 15, 2013

Interesting articles from Management INK



Top Five: Leadership, Ethics, Resistance to Change, and More



How can management scholars and practitioners better understand the factors that enable (or disable) ethics in organizational life? How are middle managers creating positive social change? These and other questions of organizational effectiveness and humane organizing are addressed in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science's current top five most-read articles. Some classic, some new, these papers are freely available to access using the links below through April 26. Please share and enjoy!
Linda Smircich and Gareth Morgan
Leadership: The Management of Meaning
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1982
Eric B. Dent and Susan Galloway Goldberg
Challenging “Resistance to Change”
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1999
David S. Bright and Ronald E. Fry
Introduction: Building Ethical, Virtuous Organizations
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 2013
Garima Sharma and Darren Good
The Work of Middle Managers: Sensemaking and Sensegiving for Creating Positive Social Change
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 2013
Edward H. Powley
The Process and Mechanisms of Organizational Healing
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 2013
Stay abreast of the latest most-read and most-cited articles from The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science: subscribe to the RSS feed, and click here to receive e-alerts about new articles and issues published online before they’re in print.