Friday, June 14, 2013

Surface RT: The first tablet that’s ready for the enterprise



Surface RT lags behind iOS and Android for consumer consumption, but it could very well be the first tablet that’s actually ready for the enterprise.

The ASUS TF101 Transformer Android tablet should be recognized as a trailblazer, because it delivered a vision of a lightweight ARM-based mobile device that bridged the tablet experience and promised on-the-go productivity. Unfortunately, the TF101 and its successors didn’t ever really catch on with mainstream consumers. It wasn’t until the 7″ Kindle Fire and Nexus 7 that Android tablets became a viable iOS competitor, and they’re largely not suitable as productivity platforms.
After trying to make a 10″ Android tablet work in this hybrid capacity for over two years, I finally gave in and bought a Microsoft Surface RT. I suspected that it wasn’t ARM devices that were the problem, it was OS limitations. Android is a great mobile OS for smartphones and consumption tablets, but it has serious design limitations for productivity use. My guess was that while Windows 8 and RT aren’t the greatest platforms for mobile consumption, they would both be better at delivering mobile productivity. So far, I don’t think I was wrong. But there are challenges in adopting RT for a long-time and invested Android and Google services user like myself. Some of those issues may have solutions that actually work better, once you change how you approach the problem. Other issues can be worked around, but the solution isn’t ideal. Still other issues are potential deal breakers. In this post, I’m going to discuss a few of my experiences and observations about the RT device.

Crippled Windows 8?

A claim I frequently hear is that Windows RT is confusing and limited. I think this is the wrong perspective. It isn’t fair to compare RT to Windows on IA. Instead, RT should be compared to Android and iOS. Especially for professionals working in a Windows environment, RT offers the most seamless integration of any mobile OS. With few exceptions, every shortcut or feature — even my favorite Windows keyboard shortcuts, plus Windows Snapping and Resizing — work the same in RT. While there isn’t a keyboard shortcut to take a screenshot on Surface RT, holding down the tablet’s Windows button and Volume down easily performs the same task. Once you have a screenshot, you can open and edit it in Microsoft Paint, just like you would on a traditional PC. You can even copy and paste the image right into Word or PowerPoint. Honestly, the ability to open a file or image in the Classic desktop, left-click to highlight, right-click to copy, and then paste it into any other app, including a Modern UI app, is something that you have to experience to appreciate.
Windows RT can be easily joined to a Windows Workgroup, gaining access to all shared resource. With some simple and familiar administrative modifications to the services control panel, the RT device can share its resources on your Windows network as well. Android offers SMB support for sharing through 3rd-party file managers, but these are not an OS-level integrated solution.
Printing support for both Android and iOS has been consistently frustrating and complex. RT isn’t perfect, but the printer support is still miles ahead of the competition. In my case, I have an OfficeJet 7310 All-in-One network printer. This printer isn’t currently supported by HP, but I gave the included Windows “HP OfficeJet 7000 E809 series” driver a shot, and it seems to work fine. If you’re familiar with a Windows environment, you’ll find RT to be a more powerful and smoother process than any other mobile platform. Inevitably, when I encounter shortcomings with RT, it’s more about getting my mind around the issue than RT being inferior. For example, I took screenshots on my TF300 and my RT device to illustrate that the desktop IE browser on RT gave a full desktop experience when writing a blog in Google Docs and publishing it to my site on blogger.com. On the Android TF300, I went into the Gallery, pressed on the images, tapped the Share icon, and selected Dropbox from the pull-down menu. On the native RT Modern UI Dropbox app, I couldn’t find the method to upload a local file to Dropbox. A quick web search indicated that it isn’t possible with the Modern UI app — and of course, the Windows Classic Dropbox app is Intel-only. Then I realized I was missing the example I was trying to illustrate in the first place. I went to dropbox.com from the Classic IE, logged in, and uploaded the image from the web interface. Surface RT is the only ARM-based platform that delivers a true desktop browser on a mobile device, and — in many cases — this opens a whole new world for ARM tablets. Not only is Microsoft Office included with RT, but RT also currently delivers a better experience in Google Docs than any Android tablet.

The FUDder becomes the FUDdee

For years, Microsoft has been accused of spreading fear, uncertainty, and denial (FUD) about competitive products. With the arrival of RT, Microsoft is now the victim of FUD. While some people may consider this “just desserts” for Redmond, many users could be missing out on a fantastic platform because they’re listening to half-truths and outright lies. The Modern UI portion of Windows 8 is not as mature of a mobile OS as Android or iOS. For achieving the goals of hybrid mobile devices though, RT is more like a real desktop than a mobile device trying to stretch and reach that goal.

Bottom line

When I try to use Surface RT as a classic mobile device, I’m less thrilled. For consumer consumption and non-business driven social media, RT lags behind iOS and Android. The app ecosystem is struggling, the Modern UI social media integration is not consistent or robust, and the media content is not as rich. I’ve asked before, “What good are tablets in the enterprise?” and I still wonder that when it comes to Android and iOS. To me, it seems like a way to justify consumer content consumption devices in the workplace. Surface RT, however, may be the first tablet that’s actually ready for the enterprise.

Google Preparing to Penalize Non-Mobile Friendly Websites in Search Rankings


Get your mobile on or else …

Visiting a desktop-only or misconfigured website on your mobile device can be a very frustrating experience. They are not easy to navigate or fail to work properly, leaving you with little to no satisfaction. To encourage websites to adopt good ‘mobile compliant’ practices, Google will be introducing new changes in how websites are ranked when users search on a mobile device.
Two of the most common problems that mobile users face are faulty redirects and smartphone-only errors. The search changes Google has in mind will focus on giving a better ranking to websites that follow good ‘mobile compliant’ practices.

To improve the search experience for smartphone users and address their pain points, we plan to roll out several ranking changes in the near future that address sites that are misconfigured for smartphone users.

Social media and academic libraries: Current trends and future challenges

 From: Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, Volume 49, Issue 1, 2012

 Academic libraries are increasingly using social media tools to promote services and highlight resources to patrons. This longitudinal study examines the social media adoption rates and practices in academic libraries in the province of Ontario over a fourteen month period beginning in April 2010.
Findings indicate that while interest in social media technologies amongst librarians has plateaued, patrons of academic libraries are using these tools in increasing numbers. Outcomes suggest libraries should attempt in the future to create more original content in areas of patron interest as well as utilize their preferred platforms with greater regularity

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

What do academics want – (includes the changing role of the academic library)

A new survey has been undertaken which looks at the changing practices of academics in the UK. Ben Showers of Jisc and Mike Mertens of RLUK discuss three key findings of the survey which demonstrate the influence of new technologies on research, the altering perceptions of support services and the changing role of the academic library.

(Interesting dichotomy - see the graphs in this article - researchers are not particulary interested in publishing in open access publications but the do want to be able to find the information they need freely available to download!)


"The survey underlines that for academics, electronic versions of monographs are not well suited to some research activities.  Specifically, a majority of academics indicated that reading cover-to-cover or in depth reading was ‘much easier’ or ‘somewhat easier’ in print format..."

and: "A major set of findings highlights the value academics place on the role of the library within their teaching and research. While only 2% of respondents visited the library to begin their research query, nearly 90% of respondents saw the library’s most important function as a purchaser of content. Furthermore, around 30% of respondents indicated that the library has a role in increasing the productivity of their research."

How Open Access Empowered a 16-Year-Old to Make Cancer Breakthrough

Published on 11 Jun 2013
An interview on Open Access to research journals with Dr. Francis S. Collins, Director of the National Institutes of Health, and Jack Andraka, the 16-year-old inventor of a breakthrough cancer diagnostic and winner of the 2012 Intel International Science and Engineering Fair.


Jack used free online articles “religiously” in creating his pancreatic diagnostic that is 26,667 times cheaper, 168 times faster, and 400 times more sensitive than the current test.  In discussing his discovery, Jack points to paywalls for journal articles as a central barrier preventing others from making similar breakthroughs.

Jack is a perfect example of the increased innovation that arises from unexpected places when anyone with curiosity, determination, and an Internet connection has Open Access to the research literature. 

Open Access scientific publishing - should you be interested?